Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT held that a transfer pricing adjustment imputing notional interest on ECBs and delayed receivables cannot be taxed under Article 11 of the India-Germany DTAA when no contractual entitlement or actual receipt exists. Chapter X/Section 92C merely determines arm's-length income and is not a charging provision; treaty chargeability governs. Where Article 11 confines taxability to "interest paid," domestic accrual-based imputation is curtailed. The Tribunal, following jurisdictional precedents, found the TPO/DRP's adjustment to be a notional construct lacking the requisite payment nexus and directed deletion of the addition, allowing the taxpayer's appeal.
The ITAT held that a transfer pricing adjustment imputing notional interest on ECBs and delayed receivables cannot be taxed under Article 11 of the India-Germany DTAA when no contractual entitlement or actual receipt exists. Chapter X/Section 92C merely determines arm's-length income and is not a charging provision; treaty chargeability governs. Where Article 11 confines taxability to "interest paid," domestic accrual-based imputation is curtailed. The Tribunal, following jurisdictional precedents, found the TPO/DRP's adjustment to be a notional construct lacking the requisite payment nexus and directed deletion of the addition, allowing the taxpayer's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.