Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a transfer pricing adjustment bringing to tax notional interest, which was neither actually paid nor contractually receivable, could be taxed under Article 11 of the India-Germany DTAA.
Analysis: Article 11 taxes interest arising in a Contracting State only when it is paid to a resident of the other Contracting State. The expression "paid" was read in its ordinary treaty sense as actual placement of funds at the disposal of the creditor, and not as deemed accrual. The domestic law principle of accrual could not be imported through Article 3(2) because the treaty context required a different meaning. Section 90(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 gives overriding effect to the more beneficial treaty provisions. Chapter X and Section 92C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 may determine arm's length price, but they do not create a charge where the treaty does not permit taxation.
Conclusion: The notional interest adjustment did not satisfy the treaty condition of interest being "paid" and was not taxable under Article 11; the addition was deleted and the ground was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tax treaty permits taxation of interest only on payment basis, a notional transfer pricing adjustment cannot be brought to tax unless the income has actually been paid within the meaning of the treaty.