Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the adjudicating authority's admission of the Section 7 application, finding a continuing debt and default by the corporate debtor despite the 09.11.2016 agreement; the revised timelines did not extinguish the obligation and the lead financial creditor validly recalled the entire loan on 09.11.2022, rendering the outstanding sum of Rs.6,10,25,59,513/- immediately due. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's contention that novation discharged liability and that the filing creditor lacked authority, holding clause 4.3(a) permitted individual enforcement by a creditor upon default. The impugned order admitting the Section 7 petition is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the adjudicating authority's admission of the Section 7 application, finding a continuing debt and default by the corporate debtor despite the 09.11.2016 agreement; the revised timelines did not extinguish the obligation and the lead financial creditor validly recalled the entire loan on 09.11.2022, rendering the outstanding sum of Rs.6,10,25,59,513/- immediately due. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's contention that novation discharged liability and that the filing creditor lacked authority, holding clause 4.3(a) permitted individual enforcement by a creditor upon default. The impugned order admitting the Section 7 petition is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.