<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal dismissed; Section 7 admission upheld as debt and default continue, loan recalled 09.11.2022, Rs.6,10,25,59,513 due</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91787</link>
    <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s admission of the Section 7 application, finding a continuing debt and default by the corporate debtor despite the 09.11.2016 agreement; the revised timelines did not extinguish the obligation and the lead financial creditor validly recalled the entire loan on 09.11.2022, rendering the outstanding sum of Rs.6,10,25,59,513/- immediately due. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s contention that novation discharged liability and that the filing creditor lacked authority, holding clause 4.3(a) permitted individual enforcement by a creditor upon default. The impugned order admitting the Section 7 petition is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:33:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:33:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal dismissed; Section 7 admission upheld as debt and default continue, loan recalled 09.11.2022, Rs.6,10,25,59,513 due</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91787</link>
      <description>NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s admission of the Section 7 application, finding a continuing debt and default by the corporate debtor despite the 09.11.2016 agreement; the revised timelines did not extinguish the obligation and the lead financial creditor validly recalled the entire loan on 09.11.2022, rendering the outstanding sum of Rs.6,10,25,59,513/- immediately due. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s contention that novation discharged liability and that the filing creditor lacked authority, holding clause 4.3(a) permitted individual enforcement by a creditor upon default. The impugned order admitting the Section 7 petition is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:33:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>