Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the adjudicating authority's admission of the Section 7 application, finding a continuing debt and default by the corporate debtor despite the 09.11.2016 agreement; the revised timelines did not extinguish the obligation and the lead financial creditor validly recalled the entire loan on 09.11.2022, rendering the outstanding sum of Rs.6,10,25,59,513/- immediately due. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's contention that novation discharged liability and that the filing creditor lacked authority, holding clause 4.3(a) permitted individual enforcement by a creditor upon default. The impugned order admitting the Section 7 petition is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the adjudicating authority's admission of the Section 7 application, finding a continuing debt and default by the corporate debtor despite the 09.11.2016 agreement; the revised timelines did not extinguish the obligation and the lead financial creditor validly recalled the entire loan on 09.11.2022, rendering the outstanding sum of Rs.6,10,25,59,513/- immediately due. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's contention that novation discharged liability and that the filing creditor lacked authority, holding clause 4.3(a) permitted individual enforcement by a creditor upon default. The impugned order admitting the Section 7 petition is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.