Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC disposed the writ petition and directed that the petitioner, whose GST registration was cancelled under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six months, may seek restoration by approaching the duly empowered officer within two months. If the petitioner furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of tax, interest and late fees as required by the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22, the officer may drop proceedings and pass an appropriate order in Form GST REG-20. The Court observed cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) has serious civil consequences and left restoration to the statutory procedure and discretion of the competent officer upon compliance.
The HC disposed the writ petition and directed that the petitioner, whose GST registration was cancelled under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six months, may seek restoration by approaching the duly empowered officer within two months. If the petitioner furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of tax, interest and late fees as required by the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22, the officer may drop proceedings and pass an appropriate order in Form GST REG-20. The Court observed cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) has serious civil consequences and left restoration to the statutory procedure and discretion of the competent officer upon compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
