Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The HC disposed the writ petition and directed that the petitioner, whose GST registration was cancelled under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six months, may seek restoration by approaching the duly empowered officer within two months. If the petitioner furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of tax, interest and late fees as required by the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22, the officer may drop proceedings and pass an appropriate order in Form GST REG-20. The Court observed cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) has serious civil consequences and left restoration to the statutory procedure and discretion of the competent officer upon compliance.
The HC disposed the writ petition and directed that the petitioner, whose GST registration was cancelled under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six months, may seek restoration by approaching the duly empowered officer within two months. If the petitioner furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of tax, interest and late fees as required by the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22, the officer may drop proceedings and pass an appropriate order in Form GST REG-20. The Court observed cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) has serious civil consequences and left restoration to the statutory procedure and discretion of the competent officer upon compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
