Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The HC disposed the writ petition and directed that the petitioner, whose GST registration was cancelled under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six months, may seek restoration by approaching the duly empowered officer within two months. If the petitioner furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of tax, interest and late fees as required by the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22, the officer may drop proceedings and pass an appropriate order in Form GST REG-20. The Court observed cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) has serious civil consequences and left restoration to the statutory procedure and discretion of the competent officer upon compliance.
The HC disposed the writ petition and directed that the petitioner, whose GST registration was cancelled under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six months, may seek restoration by approaching the duly empowered officer within two months. If the petitioner furnishes all pending returns and makes full payment of tax, interest and late fees as required by the proviso to sub-rule (4) of Rule 22, the officer may drop proceedings and pass an appropriate order in Form GST REG-20. The Court observed cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) has serious civil consequences and left restoration to the statutory procedure and discretion of the competent officer upon compliance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
