Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld initiation of reassessment under s.147/s.148, finding nondisclosure of a transfer of immovable property and resultant capital gains in the return. Noting the assessee's ex parte conduct before the AO and CIT(A), the Tribunal confirmed reopening but, in the interest of natural justice, directed the AO to verify payment of Rs.5,00,000 by cheque in May 2010 to original owners; if established as consideration, the amount is to be allowed as deduction under s.48 against deemed sale consideration determined under s.50C. Observing repeated opportunities afforded to the assessee, the ITAT restored the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication on merits and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.
ITAT upheld initiation of reassessment under s.147/s.148, finding nondisclosure of a transfer of immovable property and resultant capital gains in the return. Noting the assessee's ex parte conduct before the AO and CIT(A), the Tribunal confirmed reopening but, in the interest of natural justice, directed the AO to verify payment of Rs.5,00,000 by cheque in May 2010 to original owners; if established as consideration, the amount is to be allowed as deduction under s.48 against deemed sale consideration determined under s.50C. Observing repeated opportunities afforded to the assessee, the ITAT restored the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication on merits and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
