Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The SC allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order and held that the respondents are estopped by conduct from impeaching a compromise deed entered pursuant to an arbitral award. The Court found the respondents had invoked civil jurisdiction, asserted the suit was not barred by Section 92, accepted the award and procured disposal of their appeal on terms of the compromise deed; they cannot subsequently repudiate its validity. Applying estoppel by conduct and election, the compromise-deed-derived decree must stand, and the appellants are entitled to revive execution proceedings. Consequently the respondents' challenge to the award/compromise as a nullity was rejected.
The SC allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order and held that the respondents are estopped by conduct from impeaching a compromise deed entered pursuant to an arbitral award. The Court found the respondents had invoked civil jurisdiction, asserted the suit was not barred by Section 92, accepted the award and procured disposal of their appeal on terms of the compromise deed; they cannot subsequently repudiate its validity. Applying estoppel by conduct and election, the compromise-deed-derived decree must stand, and the appellants are entitled to revive execution proceedings. Consequently the respondents' challenge to the award/compromise as a nullity was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
