Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
The HC held that the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration was not justified as the show cause notice (SCN) did not contemplate such retrospective effect, nor were any reasons provided to support it. Consequently, the cancellation order was to take effect only from the date of the SCN, 4th April 2022. The petition was accordingly disposed of, affirming that the registration could not be annulled retrospectively based solely on the non-availability of the principal place of business at the time of the field visit.
The HC held that the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration was not justified as the show cause notice (SCN) did not contemplate such retrospective effect, nor were any reasons provided to support it. Consequently, the cancellation order was to take effect only from the date of the SCN, 4th April 2022. The petition was accordingly disposed of, affirming that the registration could not be annulled retrospectively based solely on the non-availability of the principal place of business at the time of the field visit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.