Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC held that the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration was not justified as the show cause notice (SCN) did not contemplate such retrospective effect, nor were any reasons provided to support it. Consequently, the cancellation order was to take effect only from the date of the SCN, 4th April 2022. The petition was accordingly disposed of, affirming that the registration could not be annulled retrospectively based solely on the non-availability of the principal place of business at the time of the field visit.
The HC held that the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration was not justified as the show cause notice (SCN) did not contemplate such retrospective effect, nor were any reasons provided to support it. Consequently, the cancellation order was to take effect only from the date of the SCN, 4th April 2022. The petition was accordingly disposed of, affirming that the registration could not be annulled retrospectively based solely on the non-availability of the principal place of business at the time of the field visit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.