Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
The HC held that the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration was not justified as the show cause notice (SCN) did not contemplate such retrospective effect, nor were any reasons provided to support it. Consequently, the cancellation order was to take effect only from the date of the SCN, 4th April 2022. The petition was accordingly disposed of, affirming that the registration could not be annulled retrospectively based solely on the non-availability of the principal place of business at the time of the field visit.
The HC held that the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration was not justified as the show cause notice (SCN) did not contemplate such retrospective effect, nor were any reasons provided to support it. Consequently, the cancellation order was to take effect only from the date of the SCN, 4th April 2022. The petition was accordingly disposed of, affirming that the registration could not be annulled retrospectively based solely on the non-availability of the principal place of business at the time of the field visit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.