Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration was not justified as the show cause notice (SCN) did not contemplate such retrospective effect, nor were any reasons provided to support it. Consequently, the cancellation order was to take effect only from the date of the SCN, 4th April 2022. The petition was accordingly disposed of, affirming that the registration could not be annulled retrospectively based solely on the non-availability of the principal place of business at the time of the field visit.
The HC held that the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration was not justified as the show cause notice (SCN) did not contemplate such retrospective effect, nor were any reasons provided to support it. Consequently, the cancellation order was to take effect only from the date of the SCN, 4th April 2022. The petition was accordingly disposed of, affirming that the registration could not be annulled retrospectively based solely on the non-availability of the principal place of business at the time of the field visit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.