Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld that the TPO's order implementing the DRP's directions is an internal procedural act, not requiring electronic visibility or independent appeal. The AO's assessment was quashed for non-compliance with DRP directions, specifically for incorrectly treating the cost of steam as nil and making excessive ALP adjustments contrary to section 144C(13). The Tribunal deleted upward adjustments on electricity sales made by AO/TPO and DRP, accepting the CUP method for valuation. The DRP's direction to nullify the section 80IA deduction on steam transfer was set aside, allowing the assessee's claim based on expert evidence and proper benchmarking. Deduction under section 35(2AB) was denied for lack of prescribed Form 3CL, but allowed under sections 35(1)(i) and 35(1)(iv). Issues regarding double disallowance of RoU depreciation, amortized loan processing fees, and computational errors were remitted to AO for factual verification and appropriate relief.
The ITAT upheld that the TPO's order implementing the DRP's directions is an internal procedural act, not requiring electronic visibility or independent appeal. The AO's assessment was quashed for non-compliance with DRP directions, specifically for incorrectly treating the cost of steam as nil and making excessive ALP adjustments contrary to section 144C(13). The Tribunal deleted upward adjustments on electricity sales made by AO/TPO and DRP, accepting the CUP method for valuation. The DRP's direction to nullify the section 80IA deduction on steam transfer was set aside, allowing the assessee's claim based on expert evidence and proper benchmarking. Deduction under section 35(2AB) was denied for lack of prescribed Form 3CL, but allowed under sections 35(1)(i) and 35(1)(iv). Issues regarding double disallowance of RoU depreciation, amortized loan processing fees, and computational errors were remitted to AO for factual verification and appropriate relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
