Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The ITAT upheld that the TPO's order implementing the DRP's directions is an internal procedural act, not requiring electronic visibility or independent appeal. The AO's assessment was quashed for non-compliance with DRP directions, specifically for incorrectly treating the cost of steam as nil and making excessive ALP adjustments contrary to section 144C(13). The Tribunal deleted upward adjustments on electricity sales made by AO/TPO and DRP, accepting the CUP method for valuation. The DRP's direction to nullify the section 80IA deduction on steam transfer was set aside, allowing the assessee's claim based on expert evidence and proper benchmarking. Deduction under section 35(2AB) was denied for lack of prescribed Form 3CL, but allowed under sections 35(1)(i) and 35(1)(iv). Issues regarding double disallowance of RoU depreciation, amortized loan processing fees, and computational errors were remitted to AO for factual verification and appropriate relief.
The ITAT upheld that the TPO's order implementing the DRP's directions is an internal procedural act, not requiring electronic visibility or independent appeal. The AO's assessment was quashed for non-compliance with DRP directions, specifically for incorrectly treating the cost of steam as nil and making excessive ALP adjustments contrary to section 144C(13). The Tribunal deleted upward adjustments on electricity sales made by AO/TPO and DRP, accepting the CUP method for valuation. The DRP's direction to nullify the section 80IA deduction on steam transfer was set aside, allowing the assessee's claim based on expert evidence and proper benchmarking. Deduction under section 35(2AB) was denied for lack of prescribed Form 3CL, but allowed under sections 35(1)(i) and 35(1)(iv). Issues regarding double disallowance of RoU depreciation, amortized loan processing fees, and computational errors were remitted to AO for factual verification and appropriate relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
