Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC upheld the Tribunal's determination that the goods were not prohibited under section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the violation of Rules 14(1) and 14(2) pertained solely to license conditions under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, and not to prohibition under customs law. Consequently, the Tribunal correctly set aside the order of confiscation and penalty imposition under section 112(a) of the Customs Act. The claimed exemption under Notification 53/1997 did not vitiate this conclusion. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.
The HC upheld the Tribunal's determination that the goods were not prohibited under section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the violation of Rules 14(1) and 14(2) pertained solely to license conditions under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, and not to prohibition under customs law. Consequently, the Tribunal correctly set aside the order of confiscation and penalty imposition under section 112(a) of the Customs Act. The claimed exemption under Notification 53/1997 did not vitiate this conclusion. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
