Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld the decision of the CIT(A) allowing the assessee to set off Long-Term Capital Loss from the sale of unlisted shares against Long-Term Capital Gain arising from a slump sale under section 50B. The tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by audited financial statements, share certificates, valuation reports, and proper banking channels. The assessee's investment and subsequent loss were determined to be bona fide business decisions based on financial data and updated prospects, not a tax evasion device. The AO failed to produce evidence of collusion, fictitious transactions, or related-party manipulation. The tribunal applied established legal principles affirming that commercial expediency is assessed from the businessman's perspective and mere tax advantage does not invalidate a valid transaction. Consequently, the addition disallowing the loss was deleted, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
The ITAT upheld the decision of the CIT(A) allowing the assessee to set off Long-Term Capital Loss from the sale of unlisted shares against Long-Term Capital Gain arising from a slump sale under section 50B. The tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by audited financial statements, share certificates, valuation reports, and proper banking channels. The assessee's investment and subsequent loss were determined to be bona fide business decisions based on financial data and updated prospects, not a tax evasion device. The AO failed to produce evidence of collusion, fictitious transactions, or related-party manipulation. The tribunal applied established legal principles affirming that commercial expediency is assessed from the businessman's perspective and mere tax advantage does not invalidate a valid transaction. Consequently, the addition disallowing the loss was deleted, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.