<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT Allows Set Off of Long-Term Capital Loss Against Slump Sale Gain Under Section 50B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91301</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the decision of the CIT(A) allowing the assessee to set off Long-Term Capital Loss from the sale of unlisted shares against Long-Term Capital Gain arising from a slump sale under section 50B. The tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by audited financial statements, share certificates, valuation reports, and proper banking channels. The assessee&#039;s investment and subsequent loss were determined to be bona fide business decisions based on financial data and updated prospects, not a tax evasion device. The AO failed to produce evidence of collusion, fictitious transactions, or related-party manipulation. The tribunal applied established legal principles affirming that commercial expediency is assessed from the busi.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT Allows Set Off of Long-Term Capital Loss Against Slump Sale Gain Under Section 50B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91301</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the decision of the CIT(A) allowing the assessee to set off Long-Term Capital Loss from the sale of unlisted shares against Long-Term Capital Gain arising from a slump sale under section 50B. The tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by audited financial statements, share certificates, valuation reports, and proper banking channels. The assessee&#039;s investment and subsequent loss were determined to be bona fide business decisions based on financial data and updated prospects, not a tax evasion device. The AO failed to produce evidence of collusion, fictitious transactions, or related-party manipulation. The tribunal applied established legal principles affirming that commercial expediency is assessed from the busi.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>