Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT upheld the impugned order directing appellants to pay respondents the total value of their shares at Rs.225 per share with 12% interest, dismissing the appeal. The tribunal rejected appellants' argument that dividend receipt precluded interest entitlement, affirming dividends are statutory rights and do not negate interest payable as per the final and binding NCLT order dated 24.06.2013. Respondents' challenge to valuation was held lawful, with no basis to disturb the NCLT's reasoned findings or permit further crystallization post the second valuation report. The tribunal emphasized the equitable principle that a profit-making company utilizing shareholder funds must refund the amount with interest. The decision reinforces that equity and inherent jurisdiction under Section 144 CPC mandate just compensation, including interest, to shareholders whose funds have been employed by the company.
The NCLAT upheld the impugned order directing appellants to pay respondents the total value of their shares at Rs.225 per share with 12% interest, dismissing the appeal. The tribunal rejected appellants' argument that dividend receipt precluded interest entitlement, affirming dividends are statutory rights and do not negate interest payable as per the final and binding NCLT order dated 24.06.2013. Respondents' challenge to valuation was held lawful, with no basis to disturb the NCLT's reasoned findings or permit further crystallization post the second valuation report. The tribunal emphasized the equitable principle that a profit-making company utilizing shareholder funds must refund the amount with interest. The decision reinforces that equity and inherent jurisdiction under Section 144 CPC mandate just compensation, including interest, to shareholders whose funds have been employed by the company.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
