<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellants Must Pay Share Value with 12% Interest; Dividend Does Not Offset Interest Under Section 144 CPC</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91290</link>
    <description>The NCLAT upheld the impugned order directing appellants to pay respondents the total value of their shares at Rs.225 per share with 12% interest, dismissing the appeal. The tribunal rejected appellants&#039; argument that dividend receipt precluded interest entitlement, affirming dividends are statutory rights and do not negate interest payable as per the final and binding NCLT order dated 24.06.2013. Respondents&#039; challenge to valuation was held lawful, with no basis to disturb the NCLT&#039;s reasoned findings or permit further crystallization post the second valuation report. The tribunal emphasized the equitable principle that a profit-making company utilizing shareholder funds must refund the amount with interest. The decision reinforces that eq.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=841227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellants Must Pay Share Value with 12% Interest; Dividend Does Not Offset Interest Under Section 144 CPC</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91290</link>
      <description>The NCLAT upheld the impugned order directing appellants to pay respondents the total value of their shares at Rs.225 per share with 12% interest, dismissing the appeal. The tribunal rejected appellants&#039; argument that dividend receipt precluded interest entitlement, affirming dividends are statutory rights and do not negate interest payable as per the final and binding NCLT order dated 24.06.2013. Respondents&#039; challenge to valuation was held lawful, with no basis to disturb the NCLT&#039;s reasoned findings or permit further crystallization post the second valuation report. The tribunal emphasized the equitable principle that a profit-making company utilizing shareholder funds must refund the amount with interest. The decision reinforces that eq.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 08:19:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>