Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The CESTAT upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 114A of the CA, 1962 alongside penalty under Section 112(a), affirming the determination of liability under Section 28 due to willful suppression of facts by the importer. The Tribunal relied on a precedent from a coordinate Bench which had found sufficient evidence of deliberate concealment, thus justifying the levy of penalty under Section 114A. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the penalties imposed for the wilful non-disclosure and affirming the revenue's stance on the matter.
The CESTAT upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 114A of the CA, 1962 alongside penalty under Section 112(a), affirming the determination of liability under Section 28 due to willful suppression of facts by the importer. The Tribunal relied on a precedent from a coordinate Bench which had found sufficient evidence of deliberate concealment, thus justifying the levy of penalty under Section 114A. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the penalties imposed for the wilful non-disclosure and affirming the revenue's stance on the matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
