Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The CESTAT upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 114A of the CA, 1962 alongside penalty under Section 112(a), affirming the determination of liability under Section 28 due to willful suppression of facts by the importer. The Tribunal relied on a precedent from a coordinate Bench which had found sufficient evidence of deliberate concealment, thus justifying the levy of penalty under Section 114A. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the penalties imposed for the wilful non-disclosure and affirming the revenue's stance on the matter.
The CESTAT upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 114A of the CA, 1962 alongside penalty under Section 112(a), affirming the determination of liability under Section 28 due to willful suppression of facts by the importer. The Tribunal relied on a precedent from a coordinate Bench which had found sufficient evidence of deliberate concealment, thus justifying the levy of penalty under Section 114A. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the penalties imposed for the wilful non-disclosure and affirming the revenue's stance on the matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
