Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The SC upheld the exclusive jurisdiction of the Madhya Pradesh...
SC confirms exclusive jurisdiction of Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal under 1983 Act over works contract disputes, limits private arbitration under 1996 Act
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The SC upheld the exclusive jurisdiction of the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the 1983 Act over disputes arising from works contracts involving the State or its instrumentalities, rejecting the maintainability of private arbitration initiated under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It held that the 1996 Act does not override or conflict with the statutory dispute resolution mechanism under the 1983 Act, which bars civil courts and private arbitration in such matters. The Tribunal's jurisdiction extends to both ascertained and unascertained monetary claims, as amended by the legislature to broaden its scope. The High Court's quashing of the private arbitration proceedings was affirmed, emphasizing that parties cannot contract out of statutory obligations enacted for public interest. The appellant was directed to move for recall of the withdrawal order and seek restoration of the original reference petition within two weeks. The appeal was disposed accordingly.
The SC upheld the exclusive jurisdiction of the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the 1983 Act over disputes arising from works contracts involving the State or its instrumentalities, rejecting the maintainability of private arbitration initiated under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It held that the 1996 Act does not override or conflict with the statutory dispute resolution mechanism under the 1983 Act, which bars civil courts and private arbitration in such matters. The Tribunal's jurisdiction extends to both ascertained and unascertained monetary claims, as amended by the legislature to broaden its scope. The High Court's quashing of the private arbitration proceedings was affirmed, emphasizing that parties cannot contract out of statutory obligations enacted for public interest. The appellant was directed to move for recall of the withdrawal order and seek restoration of the original reference petition within two weeks. The appeal was disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.