<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SC confirms exclusive jurisdiction of Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal under 1983 Act over works contract disputes, limits private arbitration under 1996 Act</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91195</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the exclusive jurisdiction of the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the 1983 Act over disputes arising from works contracts involving the State or its instrumentalities, rejecting the maintainability of private arbitration initiated under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It held that the 1996 Act does not override or conflict with the statutory dispute resolution mechanism under the 1983 Act, which bars civil courts and private arbitration in such matters. The Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction extends to both ascertained and unascertained monetary claims, as amended by the legislature to broaden its scope. The High Court&#039;s quashing of the private arbitration proceedings was affirmed, emphasizing that parti.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 08:28:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 08:28:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=840665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SC confirms exclusive jurisdiction of Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal under 1983 Act over works contract disputes, limits private arbitration under 1996 Act</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91195</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the exclusive jurisdiction of the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the 1983 Act over disputes arising from works contracts involving the State or its instrumentalities, rejecting the maintainability of private arbitration initiated under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It held that the 1996 Act does not override or conflict with the statutory dispute resolution mechanism under the 1983 Act, which bars civil courts and private arbitration in such matters. The Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction extends to both ascertained and unascertained monetary claims, as amended by the legislature to broaden its scope. The High Court&#039;s quashing of the private arbitration proceedings was affirmed, emphasizing that parti.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 08:28:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>