Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC upheld the exclusive jurisdiction of the Madhya Pradesh...
SC confirms exclusive jurisdiction of Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal under 1983 Act over works contract disputes, limits private arbitration under 1996 Act
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The SC upheld the exclusive jurisdiction of the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the 1983 Act over disputes arising from works contracts involving the State or its instrumentalities, rejecting the maintainability of private arbitration initiated under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It held that the 1996 Act does not override or conflict with the statutory dispute resolution mechanism under the 1983 Act, which bars civil courts and private arbitration in such matters. The Tribunal's jurisdiction extends to both ascertained and unascertained monetary claims, as amended by the legislature to broaden its scope. The High Court's quashing of the private arbitration proceedings was affirmed, emphasizing that parties cannot contract out of statutory obligations enacted for public interest. The appellant was directed to move for recall of the withdrawal order and seek restoration of the original reference petition within two weeks. The appeal was disposed accordingly.
The SC upheld the exclusive jurisdiction of the Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the 1983 Act over disputes arising from works contracts involving the State or its instrumentalities, rejecting the maintainability of private arbitration initiated under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It held that the 1996 Act does not override or conflict with the statutory dispute resolution mechanism under the 1983 Act, which bars civil courts and private arbitration in such matters. The Tribunal's jurisdiction extends to both ascertained and unascertained monetary claims, as amended by the legislature to broaden its scope. The High Court's quashing of the private arbitration proceedings was affirmed, emphasizing that parties cannot contract out of statutory obligations enacted for public interest. The appellant was directed to move for recall of the withdrawal order and seek restoration of the original reference petition within two weeks. The appeal was disposed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.