Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC directed Respondent No. 2 to adjudicate the Miscellaneous Application filed by the Petitioner under the Customs Valuation Rules (CVR), 2007, concerning the determination of import values. It was held that disclosure of data is governed by the CVR and relevant judicial precedents. The adjudicating authority must consider the Petitioner's request in accordance with these legal provisions and not leave the application pending. The authority is mandated to hear the Petitioner and pass a reasoned order on the application by 15 September 2025. The petition was accordingly disposed of, with clear instructions for timely adjudication consistent with the CVR framework.
The HC directed Respondent No. 2 to adjudicate the Miscellaneous Application filed by the Petitioner under the Customs Valuation Rules (CVR), 2007, concerning the determination of import values. It was held that disclosure of data is governed by the CVR and relevant judicial precedents. The adjudicating authority must consider the Petitioner's request in accordance with these legal provisions and not leave the application pending. The authority is mandated to hear the Petitioner and pass a reasoned order on the application by 15 September 2025. The petition was accordingly disposed of, with clear instructions for timely adjudication consistent with the CVR framework.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
