Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The HC directed the respondents to conclude the pending investigation regarding the seized imported tyres, which were claimed to be exempt from BIS clearance as they were intended for mining use. The court held that prolonged seizure solely on the basis of ongoing investigation was unjustified, especially as over eight months had elapsed and relevant reports were available. The petitioner was not liable for any wrongful use of the tyres by third parties. The respondents must issue any show cause notice within two weeks of concluding the investigation or reinvestigation. Should the goods not be released post-investigation or show cause, the petitioner may seek provisional release subject to undertaking payment of the highest duty and penalty rates and restricting use to off-road purposes. The petition was disposed of with directions to comply with the Deputy Commissioner of Customs' orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.