Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT adjudicated on unexplained cash deposits under section 69A read with section 115BBE during the demonetization period involving an assessee from an agriculturist family with income solely from agriculture. Considering the cash disclosed in the 'J' Form, agricultural produce sales outside the mandi, and reasonable expenses from April to October 2016, the tribunal held that Rs. 8 lakh of the total Rs. 9.5 lakh bank deposit on 15.11.2016 was justifiably available to the assessee. Consequently, the addition was restricted to Rs. 1.5 lakh. The appeal was partly allowed, granting the assessee relief by reducing the addition to income on account of unexplained cash deposits.
The ITAT adjudicated on unexplained cash deposits under section 69A read with section 115BBE during the demonetization period involving an assessee from an agriculturist family with income solely from agriculture. Considering the cash disclosed in the 'J' Form, agricultural produce sales outside the mandi, and reasonable expenses from April to October 2016, the tribunal held that Rs. 8 lakh of the total Rs. 9.5 lakh bank deposit on 15.11.2016 was justifiably available to the assessee. Consequently, the addition was restricted to Rs. 1.5 lakh. The appeal was partly allowed, granting the assessee relief by reducing the addition to income on account of unexplained cash deposits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
