Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The ITAT adjudicated on unexplained cash deposits under section 69A read with section 115BBE during the demonetization period involving an assessee from an agriculturist family with income solely from agriculture. Considering the cash disclosed in the 'J' Form, agricultural produce sales outside the mandi, and reasonable expenses from April to October 2016, the tribunal held that Rs. 8 lakh of the total Rs. 9.5 lakh bank deposit on 15.11.2016 was justifiably available to the assessee. Consequently, the addition was restricted to Rs. 1.5 lakh. The appeal was partly allowed, granting the assessee relief by reducing the addition to income on account of unexplained cash deposits.
The ITAT adjudicated on unexplained cash deposits under section 69A read with section 115BBE during the demonetization period involving an assessee from an agriculturist family with income solely from agriculture. Considering the cash disclosed in the 'J' Form, agricultural produce sales outside the mandi, and reasonable expenses from April to October 2016, the tribunal held that Rs. 8 lakh of the total Rs. 9.5 lakh bank deposit on 15.11.2016 was justifiably available to the assessee. Consequently, the addition was restricted to Rs. 1.5 lakh. The appeal was partly allowed, granting the assessee relief by reducing the addition to income on account of unexplained cash deposits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
