Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that no addition under section 153A could be sustained against the assessee as no incriminating material was found during the search relating to the unsecured loan in question. Additions based solely on statements of unrelated third parties, which were subsequently retracted, were held inadmissible since such parties had no connection with the assessee. The tribunal distinguished the present facts from precedents where statements of connected persons were relied upon. The AO's failure to follow the prescribed procedure under section 153C, as mandated by the Supreme Court, was noted, and since the assessment year was unabated, no further action under section 153C could be initiated. Consequently, all additions made under section 153A were deleted, resulting in the complete quashing of the impugned assessment order.
The ITAT held that no addition under section 153A could be sustained against the assessee as no incriminating material was found during the search relating to the unsecured loan in question. Additions based solely on statements of unrelated third parties, which were subsequently retracted, were held inadmissible since such parties had no connection with the assessee. The tribunal distinguished the present facts from precedents where statements of connected persons were relied upon. The AO's failure to follow the prescribed procedure under section 153C, as mandated by the Supreme Court, was noted, and since the assessment year was unabated, no further action under section 153C could be initiated. Consequently, all additions made under section 153A were deleted, resulting in the complete quashing of the impugned assessment order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.