Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

No Addition Under Section 153A Without Incriminating Material or Proper Procedure; Third-Party Statements Inadmissible

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The ITAT held that no addition under section 153A could be sustained against the assessee as no incriminating material was found during the search relating to the unsecured loan in question. Additions based solely on statements of unrelated third parties, which were subsequently retracted, were held inadmissible since such parties had no connection with the assessee. The tribunal distinguished the present facts from precedents where statements of connected persons were relied upon. The AO's failure to follow the prescribed procedure under section 153C, as mandated by the Supreme Court, was noted, and since the assessment year was unabated, no further action under section 153C could be initiated. Consequently, all additions made under section 153A were deleted, resulting in the complete quashing of the impugned assessment order.....