Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Clause 447 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 imposes a fixed penalty of one lakh rupees for failure to furnish an accountant's report as required under section 172, empowering the Assessing Officer to impose the penalty at their discretion. This provision closely parallels Section 271BA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which addresses similar non-compliance under section 92E related to transfer pricing. Both provisions aim to enforce statutory reporting obligations, promote transparency, and deter non-compliance through a uniform penalty. However, Clause 447 does not explicitly provide for a reasonable cause exception or procedural safeguards such as show-cause notices, potentially raising fairness concerns. The scope of section 172 will determine the breadth of Clause 447's application, and potential overlaps with existing provisions may require clarification. The clause underscores increased compliance responsibilities for taxpayers and accountants while serving as a streamlined enforcement tool for tax authorities.
Clause 447 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 imposes a fixed penalty of one lakh rupees for failure to furnish an accountant's report as required under section 172, empowering the Assessing Officer to impose the penalty at their discretion. This provision closely parallels Section 271BA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which addresses similar non-compliance under section 92E related to transfer pricing. Both provisions aim to enforce statutory reporting obligations, promote transparency, and deter non-compliance through a uniform penalty. However, Clause 447 does not explicitly provide for a reasonable cause exception or procedural safeguards such as show-cause notices, potentially raising fairness concerns. The scope of section 172 will determine the breadth of Clause 447's application, and potential overlaps with existing provisions may require clarification. The clause underscores increased compliance responsibilities for taxpayers and accountants while serving as a streamlined enforcement tool for tax authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.