Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Clause 447 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 imposes a fixed penalty of one lakh rupees for failure to furnish an accountant's report as required under section 172, empowering the Assessing Officer to impose the penalty at their discretion. This provision closely parallels Section 271BA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which addresses similar non-compliance under section 92E related to transfer pricing. Both provisions aim to enforce statutory reporting obligations, promote transparency, and deter non-compliance through a uniform penalty. However, Clause 447 does not explicitly provide for a reasonable cause exception or procedural safeguards such as show-cause notices, potentially raising fairness concerns. The scope of section 172 will determine the breadth of Clause 447's application, and potential overlaps with existing provisions may require clarification. The clause underscores increased compliance responsibilities for taxpayers and accountants while serving as a streamlined enforcement tool for tax authorities.
Clause 447 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 imposes a fixed penalty of one lakh rupees for failure to furnish an accountant's report as required under section 172, empowering the Assessing Officer to impose the penalty at their discretion. This provision closely parallels Section 271BA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which addresses similar non-compliance under section 92E related to transfer pricing. Both provisions aim to enforce statutory reporting obligations, promote transparency, and deter non-compliance through a uniform penalty. However, Clause 447 does not explicitly provide for a reasonable cause exception or procedural safeguards such as show-cause notices, potentially raising fairness concerns. The scope of section 172 will determine the breadth of Clause 447's application, and potential overlaps with existing provisions may require clarification. The clause underscores increased compliance responsibilities for taxpayers and accountants while serving as a streamlined enforcement tool for tax authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
