Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the Resolution Plan submitted by the appellant, approved by the CoC with an 80.13% vote share, did not violate Section 30(2) of the IBC. However, the Adjudicating Authority identified non-compliance with the CIRP Regulations, 2016 by the Resolution Professional and issued remedial directions, including a fresh valuation. The Tribunal modified interim orders to permit the Resolution Professional to conduct transaction audits and valuations. The appellant, as a successful resolution applicant, remains entitled to submit a resolution plan upon the CoC's issuance of a fresh Request for Resolution Plan. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, affirming the appellant's right to participate in the CIRP process while ensuring regulatory compliance through remedial measures.
The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the Resolution Plan submitted by the appellant, approved by the CoC with an 80.13% vote share, did not violate Section 30(2) of the IBC. However, the Adjudicating Authority identified non-compliance with the CIRP Regulations, 2016 by the Resolution Professional and issued remedial directions, including a fresh valuation. The Tribunal modified interim orders to permit the Resolution Professional to conduct transaction audits and valuations. The appellant, as a successful resolution applicant, remains entitled to submit a resolution plan upon the CoC's issuance of a fresh Request for Resolution Plan. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, affirming the appellant's right to participate in the CIRP process while ensuring regulatory compliance through remedial measures.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
