Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the Resolution Plan submitted by the appellant, approved by the CoC with an 80.13% vote share, did not violate Section 30(2) of the IBC. However, the Adjudicating Authority identified non-compliance with the CIRP Regulations, 2016 by the Resolution Professional and issued remedial directions, including a fresh valuation. The Tribunal modified interim orders to permit the Resolution Professional to conduct transaction audits and valuations. The appellant, as a successful resolution applicant, remains entitled to submit a resolution plan upon the CoC's issuance of a fresh Request for Resolution Plan. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, affirming the appellant's right to participate in the CIRP process while ensuring regulatory compliance through remedial measures.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
