Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Clause 441 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 imposes a fixed penalty of INR 25,000 for failure to keep, maintain, or retain books of account and documents as required under Section 62 or relevant rules, mirroring the existing Section 271A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Both provisions aim to ensure compliance with statutory record-keeping obligations essential for tax assessment and deterrence of evasion. Clause 441 authorizes assessing officers and appellate authorities to impose penalties but lacks a "without prejudice" clause present in Section 271A, potentially affecting cumulative penalty applications. Neither provision allows a defense of reasonable cause, enforcing strict liability. The fixed penalty promotes certainty but may raise proportionality concerns. Procedural safeguards such as natural justice principles and appeal rights apply generally. The new clause consolidates and continues the penalty regime with minor differences that may require clarifications to address interpretative ambiguities and ensure fairness in enforcement.
Clause 441 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 imposes a fixed penalty of INR 25,000 for failure to keep, maintain, or retain books of account and documents as required under Section 62 or relevant rules, mirroring the existing Section 271A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Both provisions aim to ensure compliance with statutory record-keeping obligations essential for tax assessment and deterrence of evasion. Clause 441 authorizes assessing officers and appellate authorities to impose penalties but lacks a "without prejudice" clause present in Section 271A, potentially affecting cumulative penalty applications. Neither provision allows a defense of reasonable cause, enforcing strict liability. The fixed penalty promotes certainty but may raise proportionality concerns. Procedural safeguards such as natural justice principles and appeal rights apply generally. The new clause consolidates and continues the penalty regime with minor differences that may require clarifications to address interpretative ambiguities and ensure fairness in enforcement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.