1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
By creating an account you can:
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Income Tax Bill 2025 Clause 441 sets twenty-five thousand rupee penalty for failing to maintain required books and documents</h1> The Income Tax Bill 2025's Clause 441 imposes a fixed penalty of twenty-five thousand rupees for failure to keep, maintain, or retain books of account and documents as required under section 62 or relevant rules. The provision empowers Assessing Officers, Joint Commissioners, or Commissioners to impose penalties. This largely mirrors Section 271A of the current Income-tax Act 1961, maintaining the same penalty amount and authorities. However, Clause 441 omits the 'without prejudice' clause found in Section 271A, potentially creating interpretative issues regarding overlap with other penalty provisions. Both provisions operate on strict liability principles without reasonable cause exceptions.
TaxTMI