Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT set aside the order denying exemption of long-term capital gains under section 10(38) in respect of penny stock transactions due to non-compliance with principles of natural justice. The Revenue failed to provide the assessee with the purported "credible information" and the list of penny stock shares relied upon, thereby depriving the assessee of an opportunity to effectively represent its case. Recognizing that income tax proceedings are welfare legislation and must adhere to natural justice, the Tribunal held that the assessee's right to fair hearing was infringed. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the file of the CIT(A)-NFAC for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT set aside the order denying exemption of long-term capital gains under section 10(38) in respect of penny stock transactions due to non-compliance with principles of natural justice. The Revenue failed to provide the assessee with the purported "credible information" and the list of penny stock shares relied upon, thereby depriving the assessee of an opportunity to effectively represent its case. Recognizing that income tax proceedings are welfare legislation and must adhere to natural justice, the Tribunal held that the assessee's right to fair hearing was infringed. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the file of the CIT(A)-NFAC for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.