Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

ITAT Sets Aside Denial of LTCG Exemption Under Section 10(38) Due to Natural Justice Violation

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The ITAT set aside the order denying exemption of long-term capital gains under section 10(38) in respect of penny stock transactions due to non-compliance with principles of natural justice. The Revenue failed to provide the assessee with the purported "credible information" and the list of penny stock shares relied upon, thereby depriving the assessee of an opportunity to effectively represent its case. Recognizing that income tax proceedings are welfare legislation and must adhere to natural justice, the Tribunal held that the assessee's right to fair hearing was infringed. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the file of the CIT(A)-NFAC for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.....