Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3461 to 3480 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC granted bail to the accused-petitioner arrested under Sections 132(1)(a), (b), (c), 132(1)(i), and 132(5) of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Act, 2017, offenses punishable up to five years. The petitioner, in custody since April 4, 2025, with a charge-sheet filed and no prior similar criminal record, was released considering the likelihood of prolonged trial and relevant Supreme Court precedents. Bail was conditioned on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 100,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, ensuring the petitioner's cooperation and attendance at all trial proceedings.
The HC granted bail to the accused-petitioner arrested under Sections 132(1)(a), (b), (c), 132(1)(i), and 132(5) of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Act, 2017, offenses punishable up to five years. The petitioner, in custody since April 4, 2025, with a charge-sheet filed and no prior similar criminal record, was released considering the likelihood of prolonged trial and relevant Supreme Court precedents. Bail was conditioned on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 100,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, ensuring the petitioner's cooperation and attendance at all trial proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
