Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail in a prosecution under the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The petitioner was in custody in relation to offences carrying a maximum punishment of five years. Investigation had been completed and the charge-sheet had been filed. The Court also noted the absence of similar criminal antecedents and that the trial was likely to take considerable time. In these circumstances, and without commenting on the merits, the continued custody was not considered necessary.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: In bail matters arising from offences punishable up to five years, once investigation is complete and the charge-sheet has been filed, continued custody may not be justified where there are no similar antecedents and the trial is likely to be delayed.