Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
The HC granted bail to the accused-petitioner arrested under Sections 132(1)(a), (b), (c), 132(1)(i), and 132(5) of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Act, 2017, offenses punishable up to five years. The petitioner, in custody since April 4, 2025, with a charge-sheet filed and no prior similar criminal record, was released considering the likelihood of prolonged trial and relevant Supreme Court precedents. Bail was conditioned on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 100,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, ensuring the petitioner's cooperation and attendance at all trial proceedings.
The HC granted bail to the accused-petitioner arrested under Sections 132(1)(a), (b), (c), 132(1)(i), and 132(5) of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Act, 2017, offenses punishable up to five years. The petitioner, in custody since April 4, 2025, with a charge-sheet filed and no prior similar criminal record, was released considering the likelihood of prolonged trial and relevant Supreme Court precedents. Bail was conditioned on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 100,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, ensuring the petitioner's cooperation and attendance at all trial proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
