Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC upheld the CIC's decision exempting SEBI from disclosing information held in fiduciary capacity under Section 8(1)(e) of the RTI Act concerning queries on appointment policies and related documents (Queries 1 and 2). However, the Court set aside the CIC's order on Queries 3, 4, and 5, which involved personal information of candidates and annual inspection reports, directing remand to the CPIO for reconsideration strictly in compliance with Section 11's mandatory third-party consultation procedure. The Court emphasized the necessity to balance transparency with privacy and commercial confidentiality, rejecting disclosure without following prescribed safeguards. The CIC's directions on other queries remained unaltered. This ruling reinforces the procedural rigor required under the RTI Act when handling third-party information and affirms SEBI's fiduciary obligations while ensuring public interest is not undermined.
The HC upheld the CIC's decision exempting SEBI from disclosing information held in fiduciary capacity under Section 8(1)(e) of the RTI Act concerning queries on appointment policies and related documents (Queries 1 and 2). However, the Court set aside the CIC's order on Queries 3, 4, and 5, which involved personal information of candidates and annual inspection reports, directing remand to the CPIO for reconsideration strictly in compliance with Section 11's mandatory third-party consultation procedure. The Court emphasized the necessity to balance transparency with privacy and commercial confidentiality, rejecting disclosure without following prescribed safeguards. The CIC's directions on other queries remained unaltered. This ruling reinforces the procedural rigor required under the RTI Act when handling third-party information and affirms SEBI's fiduciary obligations while ensuring public interest is not undermined.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
