<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>HC upholds SEBI&#039;s RTI exemption under Section 8(1)(e), mandates strict third-party consultation under Section 11</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90531</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the CIC&#039;s decision exempting SEBI from disclosing information held in fiduciary capacity under Section 8(1)(e) of the RTI Act concerning queries on appointment policies and related documents (Queries 1 and 2). However, the Court set aside the CIC&#039;s order on Queries 3, 4, and 5, which involved personal information of candidates and annual inspection reports, directing remand to the CPIO for reconsideration strictly in compliance with Section 11&#039;s mandatory third-party consultation procedure. The Court emphasized the necessity to balance transparency with privacy and commercial confidentiality, rejecting disclosure without following prescribed safeguards. The CIC&#039;s directions on other queries remained unaltered. This ruling rein.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:17:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:17:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=836445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>HC upholds SEBI&#039;s RTI exemption under Section 8(1)(e), mandates strict third-party consultation under Section 11</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90531</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the CIC&#039;s decision exempting SEBI from disclosing information held in fiduciary capacity under Section 8(1)(e) of the RTI Act concerning queries on appointment policies and related documents (Queries 1 and 2). However, the Court set aside the CIC&#039;s order on Queries 3, 4, and 5, which involved personal information of candidates and annual inspection reports, directing remand to the CPIO for reconsideration strictly in compliance with Section 11&#039;s mandatory third-party consultation procedure. The Court emphasized the necessity to balance transparency with privacy and commercial confidentiality, rejecting disclosure without following prescribed safeguards. The CIC&#039;s directions on other queries remained unaltered. This ruling rein.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 08:17:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>