Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the approval of a resolution plan under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Court observed that the resolution plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors in 2019, and the adjudicating authority sanctioned it in 2021, with the plan already implemented. Given these circumstances and the relevant contractual provisions, the Court found no justification to disturb the prior orders. Consequently, the impugned judgment of the NCLAT was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the finality of the resolution process and the implementation of the plan.
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the approval of a resolution plan under Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Court observed that the resolution plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors in 2019, and the adjudicating authority sanctioned it in 2021, with the plan already implemented. Given these circumstances and the relevant contractual provisions, the Court found no justification to disturb the prior orders. Consequently, the impugned judgment of the NCLAT was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the finality of the resolution process and the implementation of the plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.