Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were entitled to interference with the NCLAT order in view of Clause-XI of the approved Resolution Plan and the communication limiting their entitlement to 50% of the principal amount.
Analysis: Clause-XI of the approved Resolution Plan provided that an allottee who had not filed a claim with the Resolution Professional would not stand extinguished for six months from approval of the plan, but would be eligible only to such relief as determined on merits by the Resolution Applicant, including refund of 50% of the principal amount upon genuineness being established. The appellants submitted their claim after approval of the Resolution Plan and, on the admitted facts, their entitlement could not extend beyond the relief contemplated in the plan. The communication issued by the Successful Resolution Applicant was consistent with the plan terms.
Conclusion: No ground was made out to interfere with the NCLAT order, and the appeal failed.