Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions relating to excess production, bogus purchases, and extra sales, directing the AO to accept the assessee's disclosed yield percentage and delete the corresponding additions. Additions on alleged bogus liability and freight & cartage expenses were remanded to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication with a directive to provide reasonable opportunity to both parties. Disallowances of entertainment, telephone, generator, motor vehicle, and petrol expenses were restricted to 5% of the total claim, following precedent from the coordinate bench. The tribunal found no distinguishable facts or legal grounds to deviate from prior rulings and emphasized adherence to procedural fairness and statutory provisions in reassessing the remanded issues.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions relating to excess production, bogus purchases, and extra sales, directing the AO to accept the assessee's disclosed yield percentage and delete the corresponding additions. Additions on alleged bogus liability and freight & cartage expenses were remanded to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication with a directive to provide reasonable opportunity to both parties. Disallowances of entertainment, telephone, generator, motor vehicle, and petrol expenses were restricted to 5% of the total claim, following precedent from the coordinate bench. The tribunal found no distinguishable facts or legal grounds to deviate from prior rulings and emphasized adherence to procedural fairness and statutory provisions in reassessing the remanded issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
