Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions relating to excess production, bogus purchases, and extra sales, directing the AO to accept the assessee's disclosed yield percentage and delete the corresponding additions. Additions on alleged bogus liability and freight & cartage expenses were remanded to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication with a directive to provide reasonable opportunity to both parties. Disallowances of entertainment, telephone, generator, motor vehicle, and petrol expenses were restricted to 5% of the total claim, following precedent from the coordinate bench. The tribunal found no distinguishable facts or legal grounds to deviate from prior rulings and emphasized adherence to procedural fairness and statutory provisions in reassessing the remanded issues.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
