Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld the deduction of interest under section 24(b) claimed on loans used for acquiring let-out property, rejecting the revenue's disallowance as the interest was linked to the rented flat. Regarding the addition under section 56(2)(vii)(ii) for the difference between agreement and stamp duty values, the tribunal applied a harmonious construction with related provisions and allowed a 10% margin of variance. Since the difference here was within that limit, no addition was warranted. Consequently, the revenue's appeal was dismissed in entirety, affirming the assessee's entitlement to interest deduction and excluding the purported income addition based on marginal valuation difference.
The ITAT upheld the deduction of interest under section 24(b) claimed on loans used for acquiring let-out property, rejecting the revenue's disallowance as the interest was linked to the rented flat. Regarding the addition under section 56(2)(vii)(ii) for the difference between agreement and stamp duty values, the tribunal applied a harmonious construction with related provisions and allowed a 10% margin of variance. Since the difference here was within that limit, no addition was warranted. Consequently, the revenue's appeal was dismissed in entirety, affirming the assessee's entitlement to interest deduction and excluding the purported income addition based on marginal valuation difference.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.